W6 Reading
In their paper Effectiveness of Four Instructional Programs Designed to Serve EnglishLearners: Variation by Ethnicity and Initial English Proficiency, Valentino
and Reardon investigated the differences in academic outcome of English learner
(EL) students in four different instructional programs: English Immersion (EI),
Transitional Bilingual (TB), Developmental Bilingual (DB), and Dual Immersion (DI)
and concluded that “the English Language Arts test scores of ELs in all bilingual
programs grow at least as fast as, if not faster than, those in EI.
According to the article, English Immersion
program is a program all of whose courses are instructed in English only.
Transitional bilingual uses 50% target language at first and quickly increase
the proportion of time spent in English as the learner. Developmental bilingual
program starts with 50% English use at first as well and increase the
proportion each year depending on students’ needs. The difference between TB and
DB is that the former increase target language as quickly as possible to help
their students develop English proficiency with the aid of their mother
language while the latter increase the proportion gradually in order to help
their students develop English competency while maintaining native language
proficiency. Finally, dual immersion program mixes ELs with English-only
students together so that all students can be fluent in both languages.
The paper is to address two research
questions: (1) what are the differential effects of four EL instructional programs
on EL’s academic achievement in English Language Arts and math through middle
school? (2) Do these academic growth trajectories by program vary by the ethnicity
or initial English proficiency of the EL students?
Observing the students through at least
their third grade and analyzing the data, the paper concludes that in DB program,
students’ average scores grow more slowly than the other three but there is no big
difference both in English Language Art and math among students in EI, TB, and
DI programs.
As to the second question, the paper finds
out that Latino ELs perform better in both subjects than their Chinese
counterpart.
The paper analyzed the data with many
mathematic tools which stop me many times because I am rusty about it. Also,
when analyzing the result, the paper tested the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis
was mentioned in the article I read last week which is about how to remain
creativity in science. One of the suggestions is not to employ null hypothesis which
assumes no relationship between the findings and results in the beginning when
you just come up with a novel idea. In the paper, the null hypothesis is used
in the late stage when the researchers are analyzing the data so it is a right
timing to use it because it could keep the researcher being objective.
Finally, the paper demythologizes immersion
program and I especially appreciate its attitude of emphasizing the importance
of EL’s mother language.
Comments
Post a Comment